The PAS-PPDA candidates on the constituencies are not well-prepared. This opinion belongs to yesterday guests of Fabrika talk show. Moreover, the political analysts say that the leaders of the two parties suffer a crisis of ideas and people.

"The  politics experts say that the representatives of ACUM are bad prepared. If we concentrate on the list that they have for Chisinau constituencies, then we can definitely say that their people don't have a background and are not even well-known", said Roman Mihaes, politics analyst.

"I know five or six persons who run from ACUM alliance. Moreover, I don't even know a half of the persons who run on Chisina constituencies. I don't see a clear strategy of ACUM block. I don't know who is their candidate for my constituency. This shows that they face a crisis of persons and ideas", said Mihail Bagas, civic activist.

The guests of the talk show mentioned that Maia Sandu took the easiest constituency, No.50.

"Actually, Maia Sandu should have run on the same constituency with Vlad Plahotniuc or Mr. Filip if she considers herself a strong politician. She has chosen the easiest way, as she had a good result at the presidential elections on this constituency. Actually, Diaspora should be represented by somebody who lives abroad", said Roman Mihaes.

"A better candidate could have been Andrei Nastase. His family lives in Germany and they are going there very often. I was surprised that Maia Sandu runs on this constituency. I expected Andrei Nastase to do it", said Mihail Bagas, civic activist.

According to Roman Mihaes, Andrei Nastase's attacks will bring them fewer votes.

"They are not familiarized with the union topic. In this context, the arrogance will bring less votes for them. It is a hard situation for them. They want to monopolize the European and union segments, but in reality, they have nothing to do with these segments", said Roman Mihaes.